SMITH PATTEN is the preeminent California employment rights law firm with offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles
Northern California: 415-402-0084
Southern California: 310-806-9560
    


SMITH PATTEN is the preeminent California employment rights law firm with offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles
SMITH
PATTEN
Smith Patten is a law firm formed by experienced trial attorneys as an employment law and business litigation boutique. Founding attorneys Spencer Smith and Dow Patten have tried cases in State and Federal Courts in California and throughout the United States.

When faced with an adverse employment action, such as termination, harassment, or being passed over for a promotion, it is important to seek legal counsel immediately. We will provide you with a candid assessment of your situation and your options. Often we are able to negotiate a resolution to your situation prior to any complaints being filed in court or with administrative agencies. If litigation is necessary, we will represent you aggressively and vigorously. In addition to handling cases on behalf of individuals, we also handle multi-plaintiff and employment class actions.

In forming Smith Patten, assembled a team of lawyers that offer clients the best of both worlds: big firm legal talent with small firm flexibility and innovation.

Contact the Law Offices of SMITH PATTEN



Are you currently represented by an attorney?

Please sign me up for the Law Offices of Spencer Smith Patten E-mail Consumer Law Newsletter

 
 

Latest News

May 20, 2013: Johnson et. al. v. United Airlines et al.: Third Amended Complaint filed in case involving discrimination in promotions.
 
May 17, 2013: Frid v. First Republic Bank: FRB employee files post arbitration hearing motion regarding Wrongful Termination
 
May 3, 2013: Jimenez v. United Airlines et al.: Mexican American General Shop Technician at SFO sues United for race discrimination in Promotions.
 
April 30, 2013: Kuhn v. United Airlines: United Airlines moves for Summary Judgment against African American International Flight Attendant.
 
April 4, 2013: Veloz v. PG&E: PG&E concedes that modification of Court's standing Order regarding designation of confidential documents was unwarranted. Smith Patten will seek sanctions against PG&E and its counsel Lafayette & Kumagai.
 
April 2, 2013: Muccular v. Walkup Melodia Kelly & Schoenberger: Terminated African American Receptionist objects to Law Firms request for access to personal email account.
 
March 22, 2013: Stratton v. FedEx: FedEx fails to reach a settlement with whistleblower who was fired after bringing Hazardous Material violations and illegal business practices to corporate management's attention. Trial in this matter is set for October 22, 2013.
 
February 20, 2012: Bonillas v. United Airlines: United Airlines answers law suit of Hispanic Airline Mechanic illegally demoted.

Trending Now

Mellion v. Regional Center of the East Bay: African American vendor alleges that RCEB discriminates against minority owned facilities that provide services to adults with developmental disabilities.
Johnson v. United Airlines, et al.: SMITH PATTEN files Second Amended Complaint on behalf of 22 African American Captains and 2 African American Supervisors which details years of racial discrimination at United and Continental airlines.
Johnson v. United Airlines, et al.: SMITH PATTEN files First Amended Complaint on behalf of 22 African American Captains and 2 African American Supervisors who allege discrimination in promotions.
Willis v. CCSF, Theresa Sparks, et al.: First Ever Reverse Sexual Orientation Discrimination Case Filed Against A Municipality.
5 UCSF custodians hire SMITH PATTEN after supervisor hangs noose in supply room.
Washington and Johnson v. United Airlines: SMITH PATTEN files a race discrimination case against United Airlines on behalf of African American Flight Attendants who received highly charged race based threats, hate mail, and graphic lynching imagery in their work mailbox. 
Pryor v. United Airlines: SMITH PATTEN files race discrimination and hostile work environment on behalf of African American Flight Attendant who received highly charged race based threats, hate mail, and graphic lynching imagery in her work mailbox. 

Case Updates

Molex v. MUNI
Brown v. FPI Management, Inc.
Hoze v. FPI Management, Inc.
Evans v. FedEx

Latest Results

Perkins v. SMUD
Tinsley v. PG&E
Paul v. PG&E
Favorable Settlement in Multi-Plaintiff
Confidential Executive
Spears v. Contra Costa County
Khristina Hunter v. California